Jon Bruner from Forbes.com writes about the debate:Sarah Palin received enough positive media coverage after the debate that readers who absorbed this analysis before voting in our poll (i.e., those who voted in the morning) were more sympathetic to Palin than were those who voted before reading any analysis. Expectations for Sarah Palin were about as low as possible before the debate, which left many commentators at least somewhat impressed. This sentiment might have been effectively transmitted to voters between the end of the debate and the following morning.So to paraphrase...When we eat at Taco Bell and don't get explosive diarrhea it's a good day. Trust us Jon we at The Moose understand the value of low expectations...but we're not sold.
We think that the answer lies in this 2008 report from the AMA.
0 comments:
Post a Comment